COM425.W2A1.05.2015

Description:


Total Possible Score: 5.00

Discusses an Encounter With One of the Six Types of Annoying Co-Workers Described in the Article

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively discusses an encounter with one of the six types of annoying co-workers described in the article.

Proficient - Clearly discusses an encounter with one of the six types of annoying co-workers described in the article. The discussion is missing minor details.

Basic - Partially discusses an encounter with one of the six types of annoying co-workers described in the article. The discussion is missing relevant details and/or is unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss an encounter with one of the six types of annoying co-workers described in the article; however, the discussion is missing significant details and is significantly unclear.

Non-Performance - The discussion of an encounter with one of the six types of annoying co-workers described in the article is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Analyzes How The Encounter With the Annoying Co-Worker Was Handled

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly analyzes how the encounter with the annoying co-worker was handled. The communication methods used in this encounter are clear.

Proficient - Analyzes how the encounter with the annoying co-worker was handled. The communication methods used in this encounter are somewhat unclear.

Basic - Somewhat analyzes how the encounter with the annoying co-worker was handled. The communication methods used in this encounter are unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze how the encounter with the annoying co-worker was handled; however, the communication methods used in this encounter are significantly unclear.

Non-Performance - The analysis of how the encounter with the annoying co-worker was handled is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Assesses How a Future Encounter With an Annoying Co-Worker Will Be Handled Using the Advice Given By the Author of the Article

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly assesses how a future encounter with an annoying co-worker will be handled. The implementation of advice from the author is clear.

Proficient - Assesses how a future encounter with an annoying co-worker will be handled. The implementation of advice from the author is slightly unclear.

Basic - Somewhat assesses how a future encounter with an annoying co-worker will be handled. The implementation of advice from the author is unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to assess how a future encounter with an annoying co-worker will be handled; however, the implementation of advice from the author is significantly unclear.

Non-Performance - The assessment of how a future encounter with an annoying co-worker will be handled is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Reading: Comprehension

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Distinguishes probable implications of the text for contexts, perspectives, or issues outside the assigned task or beyond the author's explicit message.

Proficient - Uses the text and/or specific knowledge of the author’s context to draw more intricate inferences about the author’s message and approach.

Basic - Considers how textual features (e.g., sentence and paragraph structure or tone) contribute to the author’s message. Draws fundamental inferences about context and rationale of text.

Below Expectations - Inadequately captures vocabulary but makes an effort to paraphrase or summarize the information the text communicates.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Integrative Learning: Connections to Experience

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Creates meaningful correlations among experiences outside of the classroom to demonstrate an understanding of the given field of study and to broaden one's own viewpoints.

Proficient - Compares life experiences and academic knowledge to distinguish differences and similarities while acknowledging perspectives other than one's own.

Basic - Recognizes correlations between life experiences, academic texts, and ideas perceived as similar and related to one's own interests.

Below Expectations - Briefly comments about the connections between one's life experiences and academic texts.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.