BUS681.W1A1.01.2015

Description:


Total Possible Score: 6.00

Examines How Organizations Determine Relative Importance of Compensable Factors

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Provides an accurate and thorough examination of the importance of the relationship of compensable factors to corporate success. 

Proficient - Provides an examination of the importance of the relationship of compensable factors to corporate success. Minor details are missing or inaccurate. 

Basic - Provides a limited examination of the importance of the relationship of compensable factors to corporate success. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the importance of the relationship of compensable factors to corporate success; however, significant details are missing and/or inaccurate. 

Non-Performance - The examination of the importance of the relationship of compensable factors to corporate success is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluates How Compensation Strategies Tie Into Underlying Corporate Values

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Comprehensively and accurately evaluates how compensation strategies tie into underlying corporate values. Utilizes scholarly sources to support the evaluation. 

Proficient - Evaluates how compensation strategies tie into underlying corporate values. Utilizes scholarly sources to support the evaluation. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially evaluates how compensation strategies tie into underlying corporate values. Utilizes some scholarly sources to support the evaluation. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate how compensation strategies tie into underlying corporate values; however, does not adequately utilize scholarly sources to support the evaluation and significant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The evaluation of how compensation strategies tie into underlying corporate values is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Analyzes an Example Which Demonstrates How an Organization’s Compensation and Benefits Programs Have Been Utilized to Obtain Corporate Strategic Goals

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately analyzes an example which demonstrates how an organization’s compensation and benefits programs have been utilized to obtain corporate strategic goals.

Proficient - Analyzes an example which demonstrates how an organization’s compensation and benefits programs have been utilized to obtain corporate strategic goals. Minor details are missing or inaccurate. 

Basic - Somewhat analyzes an example which demonstrates how an organization’s compensation and benefits programs have been utilized to obtain corporate strategic goals. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze an example which demonstrates how an organization’s compensation and benefits programs have been utilized to obtain corporate strategic goals; however, significant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The analysis of an example which demonstrates how an organization’s compensation and benefits programs have been utilized to obtain corporate strategic goals is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.