BUS250.W4A1.01.2015

Description:


Total Possible Score: 12.00

Explains if the Creating and Uploading of Vids to the Internet are Simply an Ethical Expression of One’s Free Speech or if it is an Infringement of Intellectual Property

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive explanation of whether the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or if it is an infringement of intellectual property. Appropriately uses the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4.

Proficient - Provides an adequate explanation of whether the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or if it is an infringement of intellectual property. Appropriately uses the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Provides a limited explanation of whether the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or if it is an infringement of intellectual property. Uses the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an explanation of whether the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or if it is an infringement of intellectual property; however, does not use the ethical criteria introduced in Chapter 4 and the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The explanation of whether the creating and uploading of vids to the Internet simply an ethical expression of one’s free speech, or if it is an infringement of intellectual property is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains Where to Draw the Line When Using Material Found on the Internet, While Trying to Respect the Artists’ Intellectual Property and Rights to Royalties From Their Creations

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive explanation of where to draw the line when using material found on the Internet, while trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations.

Proficient - Provides an adequate explanation of where to draw the line when using material found on the Internet, while trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Provides a limited explanation of where to draw the line when using material found on the Internet, while trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations. The explanation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide an explanation of where to draw the line when using material found on the Internet, while trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The explanation of where to draw the line when using material found on the Internet, while trying to respect the artists’ intellectual property and rights to royalties from their creations, is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Describes How Different a Vid Should be From the Original Source to Justify That It is No Longer the Same Material as the Original Artist Created and Thus Not Covered Under the Copyright Laws

Total: 2.50

Distinguished - Provides a comprehensive description of how different a vid should be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws.

Proficient - Provides an adequate description of how different a vid should be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws. The description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Provides a limited description of how different a vid should be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws. The description is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a description of how different a vid should be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws; however, the description is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The description of how different a vid should be from the original source to justify that it is no longer the same material as the original artist created and thus not covered under the copyright laws is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.