ESE633.W1A1.10.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 12.00

Explains How to Lead This Group as the Special Educator to Find a Solution Where Everyone on the Team Is in Agreement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly and clearly explains how to lead this group as the special educator to find a solution where everyone on the team is in agreement.

Proficient - Explains how to lead this group as the special educator to find a solution where everyone on the team is in agreement. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped or unclear.

Basic - Partially explains how to lead this group as the special educator to find a solution where everyone on the team is in agreement. The explanation is underdeveloped and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how to lead this group as the special educator to find a solution where everyone on the team is in agreement; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped and unclear.

Non-Performance - The explanation of how to lead this group as the special educator to find a solution where everyone on the team is in agreement is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains the Role of the Assistant Principal as a Participant in This Meeting, Including Why He Is Participating and What Value He Adds to the Meeting

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately explains the role of the assistant principal as a participant in this meeting, including why he is participating and what value he adds to the meeting.

Proficient - Explains the role of the assistant principal as a participant in this meeting, including why he is participating and what value he adds to the meeting. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially explains the role of the assistant principal as a participant in this meeting, including why he is participating and what value he adds to the meeting. The explanation is underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the role of the assistant principal as a participant in this meeting; however, does not include why he is participating and what value he adds to the meeting. The explanation is significantly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The explanation of the role of the assistant principal as a participant in this meeting is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains How the Conflict Management Style Will Benefit the Situation, Including Consideration of How It Could Also Be a Weakness

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately explains how the conflict management style (from the self-assessment) will benefit the situation, including consideration of how it could also be weakness.

Proficient - Explains how the conflict management style (from the self-assessment) will benefit the situation, including consideration of how it could also be weakness. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially explains how the conflict management style (from the self-assessment) will benefit the situation, including consideration of how it could also be weakness. The explanation is underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how the conflict management style (from the self-assessment) will benefit the situation; however, does not include consideration of how it could also be weakness. The explanation is significantly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The explanation how the conflict management style (from the self-assessment) will benefit the situation, is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains the Conflict From the Math Teacher’s Perspective, Including a Justification and Validation of the Feelings

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately explains the conflict from the math teacher’s perspective, including a justification and validation of the feelings.

Proficient - Explains the conflict from the math teacher’s perspective, including a justification and validation of the feelings. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially explains the conflict from the math teacher’s perspective, including a justification and validation of the feelings. The explanation is underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the conflict from the math teacher’s perspective; however, does not include a justification and validation of the feelings. The explanation is significantly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The explanation of the conflict from the math teacher’s perspective is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Creates a Plan for How Each Member of the Team Can Help Provide Tools for Andy to Be Successful in Math, Including a Timeline for When the Team Will Next Meet and What Information Each Member Will Bring to the Table

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Creates an accurate and detailed plan for how each member of the team can help provide tools for Andy to be successful in math, including a timeline for when the team will next meet and what information each member will bring to the table.

Proficient - Creates a plan for how each member of the team can help provide tools for Andy to be successful in math, including a timeline for when the team will next meet and what information each member will bring to the table. The plan is slightly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Basic - Creates a limited plan for how each member of the team can help provide tools for Andy to be successful in math, including a timeline for when the team will next meet and what information each member will bring to the table. The plan is underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a plan for how each member of the team can help provide tools for Andy to be successful in math; however, does not include a timeline for when the team will next meet and what information each member will bring to the table. The plan is significantly underdeveloped or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The plan for how each member of the team can help provide tools for Andy to be successful in math is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Source Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.