Distinguished - Comprehensively examines the figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describes the chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung.

Proficient - Examines the figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describes the chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung. Some minor details are missing or inaccurate..

Basic - Minimally examines the figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describes the chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung. Relevant details are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and describe the chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung; however, significant elements are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The examination of the figure or character from the perspective of Jung’s theoretical approach to personality and the description of the chosen figure or character based on the dichotomous facets of personality as defined by Jung are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Distinguished - Comprehensively evaluates the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provides impressions of the chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI.

Proficient - Evaluates the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provides impressions of the chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Minimally evaluates some components of the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and provides limited impressions of the chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories; however, does not provide impressions of the chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI, and significant details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance -The evaluation of the current Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality instrument, which is based on Jung’s theories, and the impressions of the chosen figure or character through the major facets of the MBTI are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Distinguished - Comprehensively analyzes how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to the chosen figure or character.

Proficient - Analyzes how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to the chosen figure or character. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Partially analyzes how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to the chosen figure or character. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to the chosen figure or character; however, the analysis is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The analysis of how ethical issues might affect the implementation of MBTI personality assessment in the setting native to the chosen figure or character is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Distinguished - Comprehensively assesses the MBTI and its use to provide results on the chosen figure or character and describes the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to the chosen person.

Proficient - Assesses the MBTI and its use to provide results on the chosen figure or character and describes the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to the chosen person. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Minimally assesses the MBTI and its use to provide results on the chosen figure or character and describes the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to the chosen person. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to assess the MBTI and its use to provide results on the chosen figure or character and describes the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to the chosen person. Significant elements are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The assessment of the MBTI and its use to provide results on the chosen figure or character and description of the efficacy and reliability of this assessment as it relates to the chosen person are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Distinguished - Comprehensively summarizes and presents a detailed and well-stated opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question.

Proficient - Summarizes and presents an opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially summarizes and presents a limited opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations -Attempts to summarize and present an opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The summary and presentation of an opinion about how well this theory describes the person in question are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.

Distinguished - Provides fully appropriate research to support claims.

Proficient - Provides research to support claims. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Provides somewhat appropriate research to support claims. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide research to support claims; however the research is not appropriate or significant details are missing.

Non-Performance -Research to support claims is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.