OMM618.W1A1.10.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 7.00

Describes OCBC’s Unique Approach to Talent Management and Development

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes OCBC’s unique approach to talent management and development. Effectively applies the concepts and vocabulary from the text.

Proficient - Describes OCBC’s unique approach to talent management and development. Sufficiently applies the concepts and vocabulary from the text. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially describes OCBC’s unique approach to talent management and development. Minimally applies the concepts and vocabulary from the text. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a description of OCBC’s unique approach to talent management and development; however, does not apply specific concepts and vocabulary from the text and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The description of the OCBE’s unique approach to talent management and development is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Compares OCBC’s Approach to Talent Management and Development to other Organizations you are Familiar With

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Fully compares OCBC’s approach to talent management and development to other organizations you are familiar with (e.g., current or past employers, family business).

Proficient - Compares OCBC’s approach to talent management and development to other organizations you are familiar with (e.g., current or past employers, family business).

Basic - Partially compares OCBC’s approach to talent management and development to other organizations you are familiar with (e.g., current or past employers, family business).

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a comparison of OCBC’s approach to talent management and development to other organizations of familiarity; however, comparison does not state specific organizations.

Non-Performance -  The comparison of OCBC’s approach to talent management and development to other organizations of familiarity is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains How OCBC’s Approach to Talent Management and Employee Development Has Been a Primary Contributing Factor to the Firm’s Success

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains how OCBC’s approach to talent management and employee development has been a primary contributing factor to the firm’s success.

Proficient - Explains how OCBC’s approach to talent management and employee development has been a primary contributing factor to the firm’s success.

Basic - Somewhat explains how OCBC’s approach to talent management and employee development has been a primary contributing factor to the firm’s success.The explanation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how OCBC’s approach to talent management and employee development has been a primary contributing factor to the firm’s success; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The explanation of how OCBE’s approach to talent management and employee development has been a primary contributing factor to the firm’s success is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluates the Extent to Which OCBC’s Approach to Talent Management and Development Fits Other Organizations or Industries, Including Limitations if Applied Elsewhere Without Modification

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively evaluates the extent to which OCBC’s approach to talent management and development fits other organizations or industries, including a number of limitations if applied elsewhere without modification.

Proficient - Evaluates the extent to which OCBC’s approach to talent management and development fits other organizations or industries including limitations if applied elsewhere without modification.

Basic - Somewhat evaluates the extent to which OCBC’s approach to talent management and development fits other organizations or industries including little or no limitations if applied elsewhere without modification. The evaluation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the extent to which OCBC’s approach to talent management and development fits other organizations or industries, including no limitations if applied elsewhere without modification.  The evaluation is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The evaluation of the extent to which OCBC’s approach to talent management and development fits other organizations or industries, including limitations if applied elsewhere without modification is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.30

Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.18

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.18

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.17

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.17

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.