LEA432.W4A1.09.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 11.00

Examines How Law Enforcement Leaders Determine the Effectiveness of Enforcement and Non-Enforcement Programs for Budgetary Decisions

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively examines how law enforcement leaders determine the effectiveness of enforcement and non-enforcement programs when assessing budgetary decisions.

Proficient - Examines how law enforcement leaders determine the effectiveness of enforcement and non-enforcement programs when assessing budgetary decisions. The examination is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Partially examines how law enforcement leaders determine the effectiveness of enforcement and non-enforcement programs when assessing budgetary decisions.  The examination is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to examine how law enforcement leaders determine the effectiveness of enforcement and non-enforcement programs when assessing budgetary decisions, but the examination is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The examination of how law enforcement leaders determine the effectiveness of enforcement and non-enforcement programs is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Rationalizes Who Should Ultimately Decide What Program(s) Are Eliminated

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Clearly rationalizes who should decide what program(s) are eliminated from the budget. The rationalization is well-supported with details.

Proficient - Rationalizes who should decide what program(s) are eliminated from the budget. The rationalization is supported with details.

Basic - Minimally rationalizes who should decide what program(s) are eliminated from the budget. The rationalization is somewhat supported details.

Below Expectations - Attempts to rationalize who should decide what program(s) are eliminated from the budget; however, the rationalization is not supported with details.

Non-Performance - The rationalization of who should decide what program(s) are eliminated from the budget is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Selects Which Program Would Continue to be Funded and Assesses the Associated Risks

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Distinctly selects which programs would continue to be funded.  Thoroughly explains the rationale for the choices and comprehensively assesses the associated risks.

Proficient - Selects which programs would continue to be funded. Explains the rationale for the choices and assesses the associated risks.  The explanation or assessment is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Selects which programs would continue to be funded.  Partially explains the rationale for the choices and vaguely assess the associated risks. The explanation and/or assessment are underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Selects which programs should continue to be funded, and attempts to explain the rationale for the choices and assess associated risks, but the explanation and assessment are significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The selection of which programs that should continue to be funded and the assessment of associated risks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Critical Thinking: Student's Position

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Specific position is inventive, considering the intricate ideas of an issue. Limits of position are recognized. Other viewpoints are synthesized within position.

Proficient - Specific position is adequate, considering some of the complexities of an issue. Limits of position are recognized.
Other viewpoints are synthesized within position.

Basic - Specific position is adequate, considering the intricate ideas of an issue. Limits of position are recognized but are not synthesized within position.

Below Expectations - Specific position lacks inventiveness and insufficiently considers the intricate ideas of an issue. Limits of position are overlooked. Other viewpoints are not recognized within position.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Integrative Learning: Connections to Discipline

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Autonomously synthesizes or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Proficient - Autonomously correlates examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Basic - Attempts to correlate examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Below Expectations - When prompted, displays inconsistent examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Proficient - Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Basic - Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident, but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Below Expectations - Organization and presentation of content is extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Content Development

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses appropriate, pertinent, and persuasive content to discover and develop sophisticated ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Proficient - Uses appropriate and pertinent content to discover ideas within the context of the discipline, shaping the work as a whole.

Basic - Uses appropriate and pertinent content, but does not apply it toward discovering or developing ideas. Overall, content assists in shaping the written work.

Below Expectations - Uses content, though it may be unrelated or inappropriate to the topic. Content does not contribute toward the development of the written work, and may distract the reader from its purpose.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic - Exhibits basic knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements.

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The paper meets the specific page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Proficient - The paper closely meets the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Basic - The paper meets over half of the page requirement stipulated in the assignment description.

Below Expectations - A fraction of the page requirement is completed.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.