HIM410.W4A2.09.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 8.00

Differentiates Between the Role of an HIE and a RHIO and Explains the Implications of Collaborating With an HIE and RHIO

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains the difference between the role of an HIE and a RHIO, and the implications of collaborating with an HIE and RHIO.

Proficient - Explains the difference between the role of an HIE and a RHIO, and the implications of collaborating with an HIE and RHIO. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially explains the difference between the role of an HIE and a RHIO, and the implications of collaborating with an HIE and RHIO. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the difference between the role of an HIE and a RHIO, and the implications of collaborating with an HIE and RHIO; however, significant details are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - Did not perform this portion of the assignment.


Creates a Policy on Who can Accesses Knowledge Generated By the Practice and How It Would be Used

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Creates a thorough policy on who can access knowledge generated by the practice and how it would be used.

Proficient - Creates a policy on who can accessed knowledge generated by the practice and how it would be used Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Creates a partial policy on who can accessed knowledge generated by the practice and how it would be used Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a policy on who can accessed knowledge generated by the practice and how it would be used; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - Did not perform this portion of the assignment.


Assesses each of the Five Quality Domains Specified by the ACO Mandate, Justifies Their Inclusion/Exclusion and Explains the Implications of Each on the Structure of the Clinical Process and on the Information System that Supports the Process

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Thoroughly assesses each of the five quality domains specified by the ACO mandate, justifies their inclusion/exclusion, and comprehensively explains the implications of each on the structure of the clinical process and on the information system that supports the process.

Proficient - Assesses each of the five quality domains specified by the ACO mandate, justifies their inclusion/exclusion, and explains the implications of each on the structure of the clinical process and on the information system that supports the process. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially assesses each of the five quality domains specified by the ACO mandate, vaguely justifies their inclusion/exclusion, and minimally explains the implications of each on the structure of the clinical process and on the information system that supports the process. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to assess each of the five quality domains specified by the ACO mandate, justify their inclusion/exclusion, and explain the implications of each on the structure of the clinical process and on the information system that supports the process; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - Did not perform this portion of the assignment.


Compares and Contrasts the Differences Between Explicit, Expressed, Implicit, Latent, and Tacit Knowledge, and Explains the Importance of Each One Distinguishing Between the Two Organizations

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Thoroughly compares and contrasts the differences between explicit, expressed, implicit, latent, and tacit knowledge, and Comprehensively explains the importance of each one by distinguishing between the two organizations.

Proficient - Compares and contrasts the differences between explicit, expressed, implicit, latent, and tacit knowledge, and explained the importance of each one by distinguishing between the two organizations. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially compares and contrasts the differences between explicit, expressed, implicit, latent, and tacit knowledge, and partially explains the importance of each one by distinguishing between the two organizations. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare and contrast the differences between explicit, expressed, implicit, latent, and tacit knowledge. Also, attempted to explain the importance of each one by distinguishing between two organizations. Significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - Did not perform this portion of the assignment.


Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. 


Reading: Comprehension

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Distinguishes probable implications of the text for contexts, perspectives, or issues outside the assigned task or beyond the author's explicit message.

Proficient - Uses the text and/or specific knowledge of the author’s context to draw more intricate inferences about the author’s message and approach.

Basic - Considers how textual features (e.g., sentence and paragraph structure or tone) contribute to the author’s message. Draws fundamental inferences about context and rationale of text.

Below Expectations - Inadequately captures vocabulary but makes an effort to paraphrase or summarize the information the text communicates.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.