MHA616.W6A1.09.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 26.00

Introduction, Thesis, and Conclusion

Total: 4.50

Distinguished - Presentation is logically organized with a well-written intro, thesis, and conclusion.

Proficient - Thorough presentation with organized intro, thesis, and conclusion.

Basic - Presentation is organized. One or more of the intro, thesis, or conclusion requires improvement.

Below Expectations - Presentation lacks continuity in the intro, thesis, and conclusion.

Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Identifies the Needs That Are Present, and Explain the Minnesota Department of Health QI project SMART and meaningful Objectives for the Case Study and Apply Each of the SDLC Phases As They Relate to the Case Study

Total: 4.50

Distinguished -Identifies the needs that are present in the selected case study and thoroughly explains each of the Minnesota Department of Health QI project SMART and meaningful objectives and accurately applies each of the SDLC phases as they relate to the study.

Proficient - Identifies the needs that are present in the selected case study and explains each of the Minnesota Department of Health QI project SMART and meaningful objectives and applies each of the SDLC phases as they relate to the study. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Identifies the needs that are present in the selected case study and partially explains most of the Minnesota Department of Health QI project SMART and meaningful objectives and partially applies the SDLC phases as they relate to the study. Minor details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Identifies the needs that are present in the selected case study and attempts to explain the Minnesota Department of Health QI project SMART and meaningful objectives and apply the SDLC phases as they relate to the study; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The identification and explanations are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Demonstrates an Understanding of the HIT/QI Acquisition Through its Application in the Final Proposal Using a Decision Making Model, and Explains the Leadership Role To Be Played in the Proposed Project

Total: 4.50

Distinguished - Demonstrates a clear and effective understanding of the HIT/QI acquisition through its application in the Final Proposal using a decision making model, and comprehensively explains the leadership role to be played in the proposed project.

Proficient -Demonstrates an effective understanding of the HIT/QI acquisition through its application in the Final Proposal using a decision making model, and explains the leadership role to be played in the proposed project. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic - Minimally demonstrates an understanding of the HIT/QI acquisition through its application in the Final Proposal using a decision making model, and partially explains the leadership role to be played in the proposed project. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to demonstrate an understanding of the HIT/QI acquisition through its application in the Final Proposal using a decision making model, and explain the leadership role to be played in the proposed project; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance -The demonstration and explanation are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Develops Goals for Continuous Quality Improvement Including Applicable Federal and/or State Laws and All Applicable Information From Previous Weeks Assignments

Total: 4.50

Distinguished - Develops comprehensive goals for continuous quality improvement including applicable federal and/or state laws and all information from previous weeks’ assignments.

Proficient - Develops goals for continuous quality improvement including applicable federal and/or state laws and all information from previous weeks’ assignments. The goals are slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Develops limited goals for continuous quality improvement including most applicable federal and/or state laws and some information from previous weeks’ assignments. The goals are underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to develop goals for continuous quality improvement; however, does not include applicable federal and/or state laws and information from previous weeks’ assignments, and the goals are significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The goals for quality improvement are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Creative Thinking: Connecting, Synthesizing, and Transforming

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Renovates ideas or solutions into entirely new forms.

Proficient - Conceives ideas or solutions into a coherent whole.

Basic - Associates ideas or solutions in novel ways. 

Below Expectations - Recognizes existing connections among ideas or solutions.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. 


Integrative Learning: Connections to Discipline

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Autonomously synthesizes or draws conclusions by combining examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines. 

Proficient - Autonomously correlates examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Basic - Attempts to correlate examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Below Expectations - Displays inconsistent examples, facts, or theories from multiple disciplines.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. 


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.