HCS445.W2A1.08.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 14.00

Describes the Study Participants in Terms of Gender, Clinic Where Data Was Collected, B.M.I., and F.B.S.

Total: 3.00

Distinguished -Thoroughly describes the study participants in terms of gender, clinic where data was collected, B.M.I., and F.B.S.

Proficient -Describes the study participants in terms of gender, clinic where data was collected, B.M.I., and F.B.S. Minor details on the participant description are missing.

Basic - Minimally describes the study participants in terms of gender, clinic where data was collected, B.M.I., and F.B.S. Relevant details on the participant description are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the study participants in terms of gender, clinic where data was collected, B.M.I., and F.B.S.; however, significant details on the participant description are missing.

Non-Performance - The description of the study participants is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Presents a Descriptive Analyses for all the Variables (With the Exception of I.D. Numner), and Explains Why Each Descriptive Analysis Was Chosen

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Presents a comprehensive descriptive analysis for all of the variables and thoroughly explains why each descriptive analysis was chosen.

Proficient - Presents a descriptive analysis for all of the variables and explains why each analysis was chosen. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Presents a limited descriptive analysis for the variables and partially explains why each analysis was chosen. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to present a descriptive analysis for the variables; however, does not explain why each analysis was chosen and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The descriptive analysis for all of the variables and explanation are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Interprets Results Using Descriptive Statistics Option, Appropriate Charts, and the Excel Pivot Table/Pivot Chart for Nominal Variables

Total: 4.50

Distinguished - Accurately interprets results using descriptive statistics option, appropriate charts, and Excel pivot table/pivot chart for nominal variables.

Proficient - Interprets results using descriptive statistics option, appropriate charts, and Excel pivot table/pivot chart for nominal variables. Minor details (labels, etc.) are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially interprets results using descriptive statistics option, appropriate charts, and Excel pivot table/pivot chart for nominal variables. Relevant details (labels, etc.) are missing or inaccurate.

Below Expectations -Attempts to interpret results using descriptive statistics option, appropriate charts, and Excel pivot table/pivot chart for nominal variables; however, significant details (labels, etc.) are missing or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The interpretation of results is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. 


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.