BUS660.W2A1.07.2014

Description:


Total Possible Score: 7.00

Identifies, Prioritizes, and Explains Leadership Evaluation Criteria

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively and accurately identifies, prioritizes, and explains leadership evaluation criteria.

Proficient - Accurately identifies, prioritizes, and explains leadership evaluation criteria. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Somewhat identifies, prioritizes, and explains leadership evaluation criteria. The explanation is underdeveloped or contains inaccuracies.

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify, prioritize, and explain leadership evaluation criteria; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped and contains inaccuracies.

Non-Performance - The identification, prioritization, and explanation of leadership evaluation criteria are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Discusses the Ethical Issues Associated with Prioritization of Leadership Evaluation Criteria

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively discusses the ethical issues associated with prioritization of leadership evaluation criteria. The discussion is supported with relevant examples from scholarly sources.

Proficient - Discusses the ethical issues associated with prioritization of leadership evaluation criteria. The discussion is supported with examples from scholarly sources, but the discussion is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Partially discusses the ethical issues associated with prioritization of leadership evaluation criteria. The discussion is somewhat supported with examples from scholarly sources, but the discussion is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss ethical issues associated with prioritization of leadership evaluation criteria; however, the discussion is not supported with examples from scholarly sources and is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The discussion of ethical issues associated with prioritization of leadership evaluation criteria is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Compares and Contrasts Evaluation Criteria Across Leadership Roles

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively compares and contrasts evaluation criteria across leadership roles. The comparison is supported with relevant examples from scholarly articles.

Proficient - Compares and contrasts the evaluation criteria across leadership roles. The comparison is supported with examples from scholarly articles but is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Partially compares and contrasts the evaluation criteria across leadership roles. The comparison is somewhat supported with examples from scholarly articles and is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare and contrast evaluation criteria across leadership roles; however, the comparison is not supported with examples from scholarly articles and is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The comparison of the evaluation criteria across leadership roles is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.30

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions. 


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.17

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.17

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.18

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.18

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.