HCA312.W4A1.08.2018

Description:


Total Possible Score: 4.00

Discusses the Meaning of Common Sizing, Trend Analysis, Standardized, and Comparative Data with Examples

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses the meaning of common sizing, trend analysis, and standardized and comparative data with clear, detailed examples.

Proficient - Discusses the meaning of common sizing, trend analysis, and standardized and comparative data with clear examples. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally discusses the meaning of common sizing, trend analysis, and standardized and comparative data with limited examples. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempted to discuss the meaning of common sizing, trend analysis, and standardized and comparative data; however, does not include examples,  and/or significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The discussion of common sizing, trend analysis, standardized and comparative data is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Lists the Three Common Types of Forecasts, and Includes Information on the Difference between Forecasting and Projecting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Lists the three common types of forecasts, and includes detailed information on the difference between forecasting and projecting.

Proficient - Lists the three common types of forecasts, and includes information on the difference between forecasting and projecting. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Lists the three common types of forecasts, and includes limited information on the difference between forecasting and projecting. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to list the three common types of forecasts and include information on the difference between forecasting and projecting; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The list of three common types of forecasts and information on the difference between forecasting and projecting are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Discusses Elements of Consistency and the Criteria to be Met for True Comparability

Total: 0.75

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately discusses elements of consistency and the criteria to be met for true comparability.

Proficient - Discusses elements of consistency and the criteria to be met for true comparability. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally discusses elements of consistency and the criteria to be met for true comparability. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss elements of consistency and the criteria to be met for true comparability; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The discussion of elements of consistency and the criteria to be met for true comparability is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains the Healthcare Manager’s Responsibility When Comparing Data

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains the healthcare manager’s responsibility when comparing data.

Proficient - Explains the healthcare manager’s responsibility when comparing data. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally explains the healthcare manager’s responsibility when comparing data. The explanation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the healthcare manager’s responsibility when comparing data; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The explanation of the healthcare manager’s responsibility when comparing data is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.