HCA312.W3A1.08.2018

Description:


Total Possible Score: 4.00

Accurately Computes the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for Both Practices

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - All calculations for computing the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for both practices are accurate.

Proficient - Calculations for computing the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for both practices are mostly accurate. There less than three errors.

Basic - Calculations for computing the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for one practice is accurate. There are errors noted in the second practice’s calculations.

Below Expectations - Attempted to calculate the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for both practices; however, there are several inaccuracies. 

Non-Performance - The calculations for computing the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for both practices are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Lists the Equation and Converts Net Paid Days Worked to the Annualized Factor for Staffing Purposes of Dr. Smith and Brown’s Physician Practices

Total: 1.00

Distinguished – Accurately lists the equations and calculations for converting net paid days worked to the annualized factor for both practices.

Proficient - Lists the equations and calculations for converting net paid days worked to the annualized factor for both practices. There is one error noted in the equation or factor.

Basic - Lists the equations and calculations for converting net paid days worked to the annualized factor for both practices. There are errors noted in both the equation and factor.

Below Expectations - Attempted to list the equation and calculate the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for both practices; however, there are several inaccuracies.

Non-Performance - The equations and calculations for computing the Net Paid Days Worked for a Full-time Employee for both practices are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Discusses Staffing Regulatory Requirements and the Relationship to Operating Cost

Total: 1.25

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately discusses staffing regulatory requirements and the relationship to operating cost.

Proficient - Discusses staffing regulatory requirements and the relationship to operating cost. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally discusses staffing regulatory requirements and the relationship to operating cost. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss staffing regulatory requirements and the relationship to operating cost; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The discussion of staffing regulatory requirements and the relationship to cost is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Critical Thinking: Evidence

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Employs persuasive and applicable information from credible sources to develop an ample analysis or synthesis of the topic. Viewpoints of experts are scrutinized thoroughly.

Proficient - Employs applicable information from credible sources to develop an analysis of the topic.

Basic - Identifies applicable information from credible sources, but may neglect the application of such information toward the analysis of the topic. 

Below Expectations - Presents information from external sources, but such information may lack credibility and/or relevance. Neglects to apply such information toward the analysis of the topic.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.