MHA616.W6A1.10.2017

Description:


Total Possible Score: 32.00

Presents the Needs That were Highlighted Within the Selected Case Study as it Applies to Your “ABC Health Care” Organization

Total: 1.70

Distinguished - Clearly and thoroughly presents the needs that were highlighted within the selected case study as it applies to your “ABC Health Care” organization.

Proficient - Presents the needs that were highlighted within the selected case study as it applies to your “ABC Health Care” organization. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic - Vaguely presents the needs that were highlighted within the selected case study as it applies to your “ABC Health Care” organization. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to present the needs that were highlighted within the selected case study as it applies to your “ABC Health Care” organization; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The presentation of the needs that were highlighted within the selected case study as it applies to your “ABC Health Care” organization is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Proposes a Risk Analysis Strategy on How Organizational Needs Were Met in Accordance with Applicable Laws and Standards

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Proposes a thorough and fully feasible risk analysis strategy on how organizational needs were met in accordance with applicable laws and standards.

Proficient - Proposes a feasible risk analysis strategy on how organizational needs were met in accordance with applicable laws and standards. The strategy is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Proposes a limited and somewhat feasible risk analysis strategy on how organizational needs were met in accordance with applicable laws and standards. The strategy is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to propose a risk analysis strategy on how organizational needs were met in accordance with applicable laws and standards; however, the strategy is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The proposal of a risk analysis strategy on how organizational needs were met in accordance with applicable laws and standards is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Assesses the Essential Components of Health Care Decision Making Models, Emphasizing the System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Comprehensively and accurately assesses the essential components of health care decision making models, emphasizing the system development life cycle (SDLC).

Proficient - Assesses the essential components of health care decision making models, emphasizing the system development life cycle (SDLC). Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Minimally assesses the essential components of health care decision making models, emphasizing the system development life cycle (SDLC). Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to assess the essential components of health care decision making models, emphasizing the system development life cycle (SDLC); however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The assessment of the essential components of health care decision making models, emphasizing the system development life cycle (SDLC is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Determines the Impact Technology Has on Cultural Factors and Health Care Decision-Making

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Clearly and accurately determines the impact technology has on cultural factors and health care decision-making.

Proficient - Determines the impact technology has on cultural factors and health care decision-making. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Determines the impact technology has on cultural factors and health care decision-making. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Determines the impact technology has on cultural factors and health care decision-making; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The determination of the impact technology has on cultural factors and health care decision-making is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluates the Roles and Responsibilities of Key Players in Strategic Planning and Continuous Quality Improvement

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Comprehensively evaluates the roles and responsibilities of key players in strategic planning and continuous quality improvement.

Proficient - Evaluates the roles and responsibilities of key players in strategic planning and continuous quality improvement. The evaluation may be slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally evaluates the roles and responsibilities of key players in strategic planning and continuous quality improvement. The evaluation is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the roles and responsibilities of key players in strategic planning and continuous quality improvement; however, the evaluation is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The evaluation of the roles and responsibilities of key players in strategic planning and continuous quality improvement is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Assesses Enterprise-Wide Data’s Role in Health Information Governance

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Comprehensively and accurately assesses enterprise-wide data’s role in health information governance.

Proficient - Assesses enterprise-wide data’s role in health information governance. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Assesses enterprise-wide data’s role in health information governance. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Assesses enterprise-wide data’s role in health information governance; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The assessment of enterprise-wide data’s role in health information governance is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Compares the Role of Technology and Enterprise-Wide Information as it Relates to Data Governance

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Thoroughly compares the role of technology and enterprise-wide information as it relates to data governance.

Proficient - Compares the role of technology and enterprise-wide information as it relates to data governance. Minor details are missing or the comparison is slightly unbalanced.

Basic - Partially compares the role of technology and enterprise-wide information as it relates to data governance. Relevant details are missing and/or the comparison is unbalanced.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compare the role of technology and enterprise-wide information as it relates to data governance; however, significant details are missing and the comparison is significantly unbalanced.

Non-Performance - The comparison of the role of technology and enterprise-wide information as it relates to data governance.is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Summarizes Best Practices and Policies as They Relate to Data Governance, Information Exchange, and Technical and Structural Interoperability

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Thoroughly summarizes best practices and policies as they relate to data governance, information exchange, and technical and structural interoperability.

Proficient - Summarizes best practices and policies as they relate to data governance, information exchange, and technical and structural interoperability. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially summarizes best practices and policies as they relate to data governance, information exchange, and technical and structural interoperability. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to summarize best practices and policies as they relate to data governance, information exchange, and technical and structural interoperability; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The summary of best practices and policies as they relate to data governance, information exchange, and technical and structural interoperability is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains the Economic Impact of Your Proposed System Acquisition

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains the economic impact of your proposed system acquisition.

Proficient - Explains the economic impact of your proposed system acquisition. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially explains the economic impact of your proposed system acquisition. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the economic impact of your proposed system acquisition; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The explanation of the economic impact of your proposed system acquisition is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Formulates and Provides Answers to Three Questions That Would be Appropriate for the Board to Ask

Total: 2.70

Distinguished - Formulates and provides answers to three questions that would be fully appropriate for the board to ask.

Proficient - Formulates and provides answers to three questions that would be appropriate for the board to ask. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic - Formulates and provides answers to three questions that would be somewhat appropriate for the board to ask. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Formulates and provides answers to questions; however, there are fewer than three questions, the questions would not be appropriate for the board to ask, or significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The questions and answers to three questions that would be appropriate for the board to ask are either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Organization: Introduction, Thesis Statement, and Conclusion

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Paper is logically organized with a well-written introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion.

Proficient - Paper is logically organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One of these requires improvement.

Basic - Paper is organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. One or more of the introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require improvement.

Below Expectations - Paper is loosely organized with an introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion. The introduction, thesis statement, and/or conclusion require much improvement.

Non-Performance - The introduction, thesis statement, and conclusion are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Includes a Separate References Slide That is Formatted According to APA Style as Outlined in the Ashford Writing Center

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Includes a separate references slide that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Proficient - N/A

Basic - N/A

Below Expectations - Includes a separate references slide; however, it is NOT formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Non-Performance - Does not include a separate references slide that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.


PowerPoint Presentation: Sequencing and Organization

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Information is exceptionally organized and there is a clear, logical progression of ideas.

Proficient - Information is organized and there is a logical progression of ideas.

Basic - Information is somewhat organized, but there is not a logical progression of ideas.

Below Expectations - The presentation does not follow a logical progression of ideas and lacks organization.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


PowerPoint Presentation: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


PowerPoint Presentation: Slide Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - The length of the presentation is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted slides. 

Proficient - The length of the presentation is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted slides. 

Basic - The length of the presentation is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted slides.

Below Expectations - The length of the presentation is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted slides.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


PowerPoint Presentation: Resource Requirement

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, which provide compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference slide are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference slide are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference slide are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference slide are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.