ECE101.W5A1.05.2017

Description:


Total Possible Score: 20.00

Summarizes the Key Points of the Interview and Includes an Analysis of How it Impacted One’s Understanding of the Professional Field of Early Childhood Education

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly summarizes the key points of the interview and includes a comprehensive analysis of how it impacted one’s understanding of the professional field of early childhood education. 

Proficient - Summarizes the key points of the interview and includes an analysis of how it impacted one’s understanding of the professional field of early childhood education. The summary is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally summarizes the key points of the interview and includes a limited analysis of how it impacted one’s understanding of the professional field of early childhood education. The summary is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to summarize the key points of the interview and includes a limited analysis of how it impacted one’s understanding of the professional field of early childhood education,  however the summary is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The summary are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Identifies at Least One Key Issue or Trend in Early Childhood Programs and Explains How it Impacts the Education of Young Children

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Identifies at least one key issue or trend in early childhood programs and comprehensively explains how it impacts the education of young children.

Proficient - Identifies at least one key issue or trend in early childhood programs and explains how it impacts the education of young children. The explaination is missing minor details.

Basic - Identifies at least one key issue or trend in early childhood programs and minimally explains how it impacts the education of young children. The explanation is missing relevant details.

Below Expectations - Identifies at least one key issue or trend in early childhood programs and attempts to explain how it impacts the education of young children, however, the explanation is missing signicant details.

Non-Performance - The explanation is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Analyzes the Instructional Approach/Model that Best Matches Personal Educational Belief and How That Approach Contributes to Quality Programming for Young Children

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly analyzes the instructional approach/model that best matches personal educational belief and how that approach contributes to quality programming for young children.

Proficient - Analyzes the instructional approach/model that best matches personal educational belief and how that approach contributes to quality programming for young children. The analysis is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minmally analyzes the instructional approach/model that best matches personal educational belief and how that approach contributes to quality programming for young children. The analysis is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze the instructional approach/model that best matches personal educational belief and how that approach contributes to quality programming for young children, however,  the analysis is signifcantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The analysis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Describes the Instructional Theory That Best Matches Personal Educational Belief and How that Theory Contributes to Quality Programming for Young Children

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively describes the instructional theory that best matches personal educational belief and how that theory contributes to quality programming for young children.

Proficient - Describes the instructional theory that best matches personal educational belief and how that theory contributes to quality programming for young children. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially describes the instructional theory that best matches personal educational belief and how that theory contributes to quality programming for young children. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe the instructional theory that best matches personal educational belief and how that theory contributes to quality programming for young children, however,  signicant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The description is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Discusses How Knowledge of the Developmental Domains of Early Childhood Influences the Ability to Adhere to Developmentally Appropriate Practices

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly discusses how knowledge of the developmental domains of early childhood influences the ability to adhere to developmentally appropriate practices.

Proficient - Discusses how knowledge of the developmental domains of early childhood influences the ability to adhere to developmentally appropriate practices. The discussion is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Partailly discusses how knowledge of the developmental domains of early childhood influences the ability to adhere to developmentally appropriate practices. The discussion is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss how knowledge of the developmental domains of early childhood influences the ability to adhere to developmentally appropriate practices; however, the discussion is underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The discussion is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Devises a Plan for Including Families Into Their Child’s Education and Defend How the Plan Will Be Beneficial

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Devises a comprehensive plan for including families into their child’s education and defend how the plan will be beneficial. The plan is fully appropriate.

Proficient - Devises a plan for including families into their child’s education and defend how the plan will be beneficial. The plan is appropriate.

Basic - Devises a limited plan for including families into their child’s education and defend how the plan will be beneficial. The plan is mostly appropriate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to devise a plan for including families into their child’s education and defend how the plan will be beneficial; however, the plan is somewhat inappropriate.

Non-Performance - The plan is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains Plans for Future in Early Childhood Education, Including the Additional Qualifications and Competencies Needed to Acquire in Order to Qualify for a Career in the Field of Early Childhood Education

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains plans for future in early childhood education, including the additional qualifications and competencies needed to acquire in order to qualify for a career in the field of early childhood education.

Proficient - Explains plans for future in early childhood education, including the additional qualifications and competencies needed to acquire in order to qualify for a career in the field of early childhood education. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially explains plans for future in early childhood education, including the additional qualifications and competencies needed to acquire in order to qualify for a career in the field of early childhood education. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain plans for future in early childhood education, including the additional qualifications and competencies needed to acquire in order to qualify for a career in the field of early childhood education; however, significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The plan for the future is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.

Proficient - Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.

Basic - Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.

Below Expectations - Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Evidence and Sources

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Demonstrates consistent use of reliable, appropriate sources and/or evidence to support ideas that are situated within the discipline and genre of the writing.

Proficient - Demonstrates mostly consistent use of reliable sources that are appropriate to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer some support to the ideas in the writing. 

Basic - Demonstrates somewhat inconsistent use of sources that are mostly reliable to the discipline and genre of the writing. Sources offer little support to the ideas in the writing.

Below Expectations - Inconsistently utilizes sources and/or evidence that may be unrelated and offer little support to the ideas in the writing. 

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.