HRM660.W6A1.09.2016

Description:


Total Possible Score: 24.00

Creates a One-Paragraph Abstract that Addresses the Final Assignment’s Purpose, Method, and Conclusions

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Creates a thorough and clear one-paragraph abstract that includes the Final Assignment’s purpose, methods, and conclusions.

Proficient - Creates a one-paragraph abstract that includes the Final Assignment’s purpose, methods, and conclusions. Minor details are missing or slightly unclear.

Basic - Creates a partial one-paragraph abstract that includes the Final Assignment’s purpose, methods, and conclusions. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create an abstract; however, one or more of the elements of the Final Assignment’s purpose, methods, and conclusions are missing and/or unclear.

Non-Performance - The abstract is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Incorporates Week One Assignment into the Final Draft Utilizing Instructor and Peer Feedback

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly incorporates the Week One assignment into the final draft. The Week One assignment has been accurately corrected and adapted per instructor and peer feedback.

Proficient - Incorporates the Week One assignment into the final draft. Minor corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Basic - Minimally incorporates the Week One assignment into the final draft. Relevant corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Below Expectations - Attempts to incorporate the Week One assignment into the final draft; however, no corrections were included in the final draft.

Non-Performance - The Week One incorporation into the final draft is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Incorporates Week Two Assignment into the Final Draft Utilizing Instructor Feedback

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly incorporates the Week Two assignment into the final draft. The week two assignment has been accurately corrected and adapted as per instructor feedback.

Proficient - Incorporates the Week Two assignment into the final draft. Minor corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Basic - Minimally incorporates the Week Two assignment into the final draft. Relevant corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Below Expectations - Attempts to incorporate the Week Two assignment into the final draft; however, no corrections were included in the final draft.

Non-Performance - The Week Two assignment incorporation into the final draft is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Incorporates Week Three Assignment into the Final Draft Utilizing Instructor Feedback

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly incorporates the Week Three assignment into the final draft. The week three assignment has been accurately corrected and adapted as per instructor feedback.

Proficient - Incorporates the Week Three assignment into the final draft. Minor corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Basic - Minimally incorporates the Week Three assignment into the final draft. Relevant corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Below Expectations - Attempts to incorporate the Week Three assignment into the final draft; however, no corrections were included in the final draft.

Non-Performance - The Week Three assignment incorporation into the final draft is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Incorporates Week Four Assignment into the Final Draft Utilizing Instructor and Peer Feedback

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly incorporates the Week Four assignment into the final draft. The week four assignment has been accurately corrected and adapted as per instructor feedback.

Proficient - Incorporates the Week Four assignment into the final draft. Minor corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Basic - Minimally incorporates the Week Four assignment into the final draft. Relevant corrections and suggestions were not included in the final paper.

Below Expectations - Attempts to incorporate the Week Four assignment into the final draft; however, no corrections were included in the final draft.

Non-Performance - The Week Four assignment incorporation into the final draft is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Creates a Minimum of Three Effective Recruitment Strategies Ensuring the Organization will Hire and Maintain High-Quality Employees

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly creates at least three effective recruitment strategies ensuring the organization will hire and maintain high-quality employees.

Proficient - Creates three effective recruitment strategies ensuring the organization will hire and maintain high-quality employees. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially creates three recruitment strategies ensuring the organization will hire and maintain high-quality employees. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a recruitment strategy; however, there are less than three strategies or not effective in ensuring the organization will hire and maintain high-quality employees, and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The minimum of three effective recruitment strategies is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Explains How the Recruitment Strategies Will be Implemented and Support the Human Resource Management Strategy

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly and accurately explains how the recruitment strategies will be implemented and the human resource management strategy.

Proficient - Explains how the recruitment strategies will be implemented and support the human resource management strategy. Minor details are missing or inaccurate.

Basic - Partially explains how the recruitment strategies will be implemented and support the human resource management strategy. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain how the recruitment strategies will be implemented; however, there is no explanation of how the strategies will support the human resource management strategy, and significant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The explanation of how the recruitment strategies will be implemented and support the human resource management strategy is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Examines the Problem Identified in Week One from the Perspective of Legal, Regulatory, and Ethical Compliance and Explains How the Proposed Intervention Addresses These Compliance

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly examines the problem identified in Week One from the perspective of legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance, and comprehensively and accurately explains how the proposed intervention addresses the compliance issues.

Proficient - Examines the problem identified in Week One from the perspective of legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance, and explains how the proposed intervention addresses the compliance issues. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic - Minimally examines the problem identified in Week One from the perspective of legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance, and partially explains how the proposed intervention addresses the compliance issues. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Attempts to examine the problem identified in Week One from the perspective of legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance; however, there is little or no explanation of how the proposed intervention addresses the compliance issues, and significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance - The examination of the problem identified in Week One from the perspective of legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance and the explanation of the proposed interventions are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Creates a One-Paragraph Conclusion of at Least 350 Words Containing the Reiteration of the Final Assignment’s Purpose, Method, and Final Conclusions

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Creates a thorough and clear one-paragraph conclusion of at least 350 words that reiterates the purpose, methods, and final conclusions of the Final Assignment.

Proficient - Creates a one-paragraph conclusion of at least 350 words that reiterates the purpose, methods, and final conclusions of the Final Assignment. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Creates a partial one-paragraph conclusion of at least 350 words that reiterates the purpose, methods, and final conclusions of the Final Assignment Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a conclusion; however, one or more of the elements of purpose, methods, and final conclusions are missing, the conclusion does not meet the word count requirement, and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The conclusion is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.75

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.