SCI207.W5L1.08.2016

Description:


Total Possible Score: 6.00

Demonstration 1, Question 1: Describes Which Water Cycle Processes Are Represented in This Model

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components.

Proficient - Describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic – Briefly describes which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not describe which water cycle processes are represented in the model and by what components.


Demonstration 1, Question 2: Describes Which Water Cycle Processes Are Not Represented in This Model

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly describes which processes are not represented in the model, detailing how to alter the model to include these processes.

Proficient - Describes which processes are not represented in the model detailing how to alter the model, to include these processes. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic – Briefly describes which processes are not represented in the model, detailing how to alter the model to include these processes. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe which processes are not represented in the model, detailing how to alter the model to include these processes; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not describe which processes are not represented in the model and detail how to alter the model to include these processes.


Demonstration 1, Question 3: Describes How Weather Would Be Affected if the Water Temperature Increased and Decreased

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and decreased.

Proficient - Describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and decreased. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic – Briefly describes how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and decreased. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and decreased; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not describe how the weather would be affected if the water temperature in the bag was increased and decreased.


Experiment 1, Question 1: Develops a Hypothesis on the Effect of Sunlight on Evaporation

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Develops a logical hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation.

Proficient - Develops a mostly logical hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation. Minor errors in hypothesis format are present.

Basic - Develops a somewhat logical hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation. Relevant errors in hypothesis format are present.

Below Expectations – Attempts to develop a hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation; however, the hypothesis does not properly address the experimental question, and significant errors in the hypothesis format are present.

Non-Performance – Does not develop a hypothesis related to the effect of sunlight on evaporation.


Experiment 1, Question 2: Accepts or Rejects Hypothesis, and Explains How This Was Determined

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately accepts or rejects the hypothesis proposed in Question 1, and thoroughly explains how this was determined.

Proficient - Accurately accepts or rejects the hypotheses proposed in Question 1, and explains how this was determined. Minor details of the explanation are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic - Accurately accepts or rejects the hypotheses proposed in Question 1, and minimally explains how this was determined. Relevant details of the explanation are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations - Accepts or rejects the hypotheses proposed in Question 1, and attempts to explain how this was determined; however, the explanation contradicts the acceptance or rejection of the hypothesis, and significant details of the explanation are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not accept or reject the hypothesis proposed in Question 1 and explain how this was determined.


Experiment 1, Question 3: Describes What Parts of the Water Cycle Are Represented

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment.

Proficient - Describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic – Briefly describes what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not describe what parts of the water cycle are represented in this experiment.


Experiment 1, Question 4: Describes How Increasing the Amount of Land Would Affect the Amount of Water Vapor Released

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released.

Proficient - Describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic – Briefly describes how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not describe how increasing the proportion of land to water affects the amount of water vapor released.


Experiment 1, Question 5: Describes How Drought Conditions Would Impact Infiltration and Evaporation

Total: 0.73

Distinguished - Accurately and thoroughly describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil.

Proficient - Describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil. Minor details are missing or slightly inaccurate.

Basic – Briefly describes how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil. Relevant details are missing and/or inaccurate.

Below Expectations – Attempts to describe how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil; however, significant details are missing and inaccurate.

Non-Performance – Does not to describe how drought conditions would impact infiltration and evaporation from the soil.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.08

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors, and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors, and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors, which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors, which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.08

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting for both in-text citations and references at the end of the lab form.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting for both in-text citations and references at the end of the lab form; however, layout contains a few minor errors.

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting for in-text citations and references at the end of the lab form. However, citations and/or references do not meet many APA requirements.

Below Expectations - Does not exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting for in-text citations and references. There are frequent errors, making the layout of citations and references difficult to distinguish as APA. In-text citations may be missing completely.

Non-Performance - Although the assignment required use of a source to answer one or more questions, no source is cited or referenced on the lab form.  Sources may not have been used, or their use is entirely undocumented.