PSY650.W2A1.08.2016

Description:


Total Possible Score: 9.00

Explains the Connection Between Each Theoretical Orientation Used By Dr. Remoc And The Four Interventions Utilized In The Case

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly explains the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case. 

Proficient - Explains the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case. Minor details are missing. 

Basic - Partially explains the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case. Relevant details are missing. 

Below Expectations - Attempts to explain the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case; however, significant details are missing. 

Non Performance -The explanation of the connection between each theoretical orientation used by Dr. Remoc and the four interventions utilized in the case is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Assesses The Efficacy Of Integrating Two Orientations Based On The Information Presented In The Case Study

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly assesses the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study.

Proficient - Assesses the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Partially assesses the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study. Relevant details are missing. 

Below Expectations - Attempts to assess the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study; however, significant details are missing. 

Non Performance - The assessment of the efficacy of integrating two orientations based on the information presented in the case study is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Describes Some Potential Problems With Prescribing Medication As The Only Treatment Option For Children With ADHD

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD. 

Proficient - Describes some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally describes some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD; however, significant details are missing. 

Non Performance -The description of some potential problems with prescribing medication as the only treatment option for children with ADHD is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Identifies Tasks And Positive Reinforcements That Might Be Included In Billy’s Token Economy Chart Given The Behavior Issues Described In The Case

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Clearly and thoroughly identifies tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case.

Proficient - Identifies tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic - Minimally identifies tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case. Details are missing and/or unclear. 

Below Expectations - Attempts to identify tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case; however, significant details are missing and unclear.

Non Performance - The identification of tasks and positive reinforcements that might be included in Billy’s token economy chart given the behavior issues described in the case is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluates the Effectiveness Of The Four Treatment Interventions Implemented By Dr. Remoc Supporting Statements With Information From The Case And Two To Three Peer-Reviewed Articles From The Ashford University Library

Total: 2.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly evaluates the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc supporting statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library.

Proficient - Evaluates the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc supporting statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally evaluates the effectiveness of three of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc supporting statements with information from the case and two peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc supporting statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library; however, fewer than three are evaluated, only one peer reviewed article is used, or significant details are missing.

Non Performance - The evaluation of the effectiveness of the four treatment interventions implemented by Dr. Remoc supporting statements with information from the case and two to three peer-reviewed articles from the Ashford University Library is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Recommends Three Additional Treatment Interventions That Would Be Appropriate In This Case, Justifying The Selections With Information From Hamblin And Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders”

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Recommends three additional treatment interventions that would be fully appropriate in this case, thoroughly justifying the selections with information from Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders”.

Proficient - Recommends three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case, justifying the selections with information from Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders”. Minor details are missing or unclear.

Basic - Recommends three additional treatment interventions that would be somewhat appropriate in this case, minimally justifying the selections with information from Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders”. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to recommend three additional treatment interventions for this case; however, the recommendations are not appropriate, the selections are not justified with information from Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders”, or significant details are missing and unclear.

Non Performance - The recommendation of three additional treatment interventions that would be appropriate in this case, justifying the selections with information from Hamblin and Gross “Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorders” is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 0.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Critical Thinking: Explanation of Issues

Total: 0.25

Distinguished - Clearly and comprehensively explains the issue to be considered, delivering all relevant information necessary for a full understanding.

Proficient - Clearly explains the issue to be considered, delivering enough relevant information for an adequate understanding.

Basic - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, delivering minimal information for a basic understanding.

Below Expectations - Briefly explains the issue to be considered, but may not deliver additional information necessary for a basic understanding.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.