CRJ613.W6A1.03.2016

Description:


Total Possible Score: 35.00

Provides at Least One Recommendation for Improvement to the United States Criminal Justice System, which Includes Court System, Policing, Corrections, and Investigative Agencies

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Provides at least one recommendation for improvement to the United States criminal justice system, which includes the court system, policing, corrections, and investigative agencies. The recommendation is fully supported by research and examples.

Proficient - Provides at least one recommendation for improvement to the United States criminal justice system, which includes the court system, policing, corrections, and investigative agencies. The recommendation is supported by research and examples. Minor details are missing.

.

Basic - Provides at least one recommendation for improvement to the United States criminal justice system, which includes the court system, policing, corrections, and investigative agencies. The recommendation is partially supported by research and examples. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide at least one recommendation for improvement to the United States criminal justice system, which includes the court system, policing, corrections, and investigative agencies; however, the recommendation is not supported by research and examples, and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The inclusion of at least one recommendation for improvement to the United States criminal justice system, which includes the court system, policing, corrections, and investigative agencies, is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Provides a Rationale, with Supporting Resources for the Recommendation of These Changes to the United States Criminal Justice System

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Provides a rationale, with supporting resources, for the recommendation of these changes to the United States criminal justice system. The rationale is fully supported by research and examples.

Proficient - Provides a rationale, with supporting resources, for the recommendation of these changes to the United States criminal justice system. The rationale is supported by research and examples. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Provides a rationale, with supporting resources, for the recommendation of these changes to the United States criminal justice system. The rationale is partially supported by research and examples. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to provide a rationale, with supporting resources, for the recommendation of these changes to the United States criminal justice system; however, the rationale is not supported by research and examples and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The rationale, with supporting resources, for the recommendation of these changes to the United States criminal justice system is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluates the Criminal Justice Systems by Examining the Global Criminal Activity in the Two Chosen Countries

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Comprehensively evaluates the criminal justice systems by examining the global criminal activity in the two chosen countries. The evaluation is fully supported by research and examples.

Proficient - Evaluates the criminal justice systems by examining the global criminal activity in the two chosen countries. The evaluation is supported by research and examples. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally evaluates the criminal justice systems by examining the global criminal activity in the two chosen countries. The evaluation is partially supported by research and examples. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the criminal justice systems by examining the global criminal activity in the two countries you chose; however, is not supported by research and examples, and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The evaluation of the criminal justice systems by examining the global criminal activity in the two countries you chose is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Analyzes the Differing Cultural Perspectives on Policing, Courts, and Corrections of Chosen Countries

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly analyzes the differing cultural perspectives on policing, courts, and corrections of chosen countries. The analysis is fully supported by research and examples.

Proficient - Analyzes the differing cultural perspectives on policing, courts, and corrections of chosen countries. The analysis is supported by research and examples. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally analyzes the differing cultural perspectives on policing, courts, and corrections of chosen countries. The analysis is partially supported by research and examples. Relevant details are missing.

Below Expectations - Attempts to analyze the differing cultural perspectives on policing, courts, and corrections of chosen countries; however, the analysis is not supported by research and examples, and significant details are missing.

Non-Performance - The analysis of the differing cultural perspectives on policing, courts, and corrections of chosen countries is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluates International Policing and Investigative Agencies While Creating a Comparative Justice Classification Strategy

Total: 6.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly evaluates international policing and investigative agencies while creating a clear comparative justice classification strategy. The evaluation is fully supported by research and examples.

Proficient - Evaluates international policing and investigative agencies while creating a clear comparative justice classification strategy. The evaluation is supported by research and examples. Minor details are missing.

Basic - Minimally evaluates international policing and investigative agencies while creating a comparative justice classification strategy. The evaluation is partially supported by research and examples. Relevant details are missing and/or unclear.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate international policing and investigative agencies while creating a comparative justice classification strategy; however, the evaluation is not supported by research and examples, and significant details are missing and unclear.

Non-Performance - The evaluation of international policing and investigative agencies while creating a comparative justice classification strategy is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.50

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.