CRJ524.W6A1.01.2016

Description:


Total Possible Score: 35.00

Compile a Comprehensive Job Description for Current Line of Work or Intended Line of Work

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Compiles a comprehensive job description for current line of work or intended line of work.

Proficient - Compiles a job description for current line of work or intended line of work. The job description is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Compiles a limited job description for current line of work or intended line of work. The job description is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to compile a comprehensive job description for current line of work or intended line of work; however, the job is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The comprehensive job description for current line of work or intended line of work is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Identify All of the Stakeholders Related to the Stated Position

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Clearly identifies all of the stakeholders related to the stated position.

Proficient - N/A

Basic - Identifies some of the stakeholders related to the stated position.

Below Expectations - N/A

Non-Performance - The identification of all of the stakeholders related to the stated position is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Describe at Least Three Practical Work Scenarios Where Ethical Decision Making and Moral Action must be Taken in the Stated Position

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly describes at least three practical work scenarios where ethical decision making and moral action must be taken in the stated position. The description is fully supported by scholarly sources.

Proficient - Describes at least three practical work scenarios where ethical decision making and moral action must be taken in the position. The description is supported by scholarly sources but slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally describes at least three practical work scenarios where ethical decision making and moral action must be taken in the position. The description is partially supported by scholarly sources and underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to describe at least three practical work scenarios where ethical decision making and moral action must be taken in the position; however, the description is not supported by scholarly sources and significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The description of at least three practical work scenarios where ethical decision making and moral action must be taken in the position is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Evaluate the Pros and Cons of Two Ethical Theories Applicable to the Chosen Work Scenarios

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly evaluates the pros and cons of two ethical theories applicable to the chosen work scenarios. The evaluation is fully supported by scholarly sources.

Proficient - Evaluates the pros and cons of two ethical theories applicable to the chosen work scenarios. The evaluation is supported by scholarly sources but slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally evaluates the pros and cons of two ethical theories applicable to the chosen work scenarios. The evaluation is partially supported by scholarly sources and underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to evaluate the pros and cons of two ethical theories applicable to the chosen work scenarios; however, the evaluation is not supported by scholarly sources and significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The evaluation of the pros and cons of two ethical theories applicable to the chosen work scenarios is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Create a Code of Ethics For the Position and Provides the Foundational Sources For the Code

Total: 5.00

Distinguished - Creates a fully developed code of ethics for the position, and provides the foundational sources for the code.

Proficient - Creates a code of ethics for the position, and provides the foundational sources for the code. The code of ethics is slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally creates a code of ethics for the position and provides the foundational sources for the code. The code of ethics is underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to create a code of ethics for the position and provide the foundational sources for the code; however, the code of ethics is significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The code of ethics for the position and the providing of the foundational sources for your code are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.


Design a Best-Practices Checklist for Chosen Position

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Designs a thorough best-practices checklist for chosen position. The checklist is fully supported by scholarly sources.

Proficient - Designs a best-practices checklist for chosen position. The checklist is supported by scholarly sources but slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Designs a minimal best-practices checklist for chosen position. The checklist is partially supported by scholarly sources and underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to design a best-practices checklist for chosen position; however, the checklist is not supported by scholarly sources and significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The design of a best-practices checklist for chosen position is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Propose How the Code of Ethics will Positively Impact all Stakeholders to the Position

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - Thoroughly proposes how the code of ethics will positively impact all stakeholders to the position. The proposal is fully supported by scholarly sources.

Proficient - Proposes how the code of ethics will positively impact all stakeholders to the position. The proposal is supported by scholarly sources but slightly underdeveloped.

Basic - Minimally proposes how the code of ethics will positively impact all stakeholders to the position. The proposal is partially supported by scholarly sources and underdeveloped.

Below Expectations - Attempts to propose how the code of ethics will positively impact all stakeholders to the position; however, the proposal is not supported by scholarly sources and significantly underdeveloped.

Non-Performance - The proposal of how the code of ethics will positively impact all stakeholders to the position is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.


Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics

Total: 3.00

Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.

Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.

Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.

Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: APA Formatting

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.

Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. 

Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. 

Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Page Requirement

Total: 4.00

Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. 

Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.

Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages.   

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.


Written Communication: Resource Requirement

Total: 1.00

Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.

Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.

Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.

Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.